TechCrunch has an interesting piece on why Friendster failed where MySpace succeeded. I think the notion that Friendster’s bad architecture problem had a lot to do with it. Yes, it did suck and it was quite slow. However, look at MySpace - built on ColdFusion with significant failures of various functions. In my experience the site is ridden with bad code that doesn’t scale and lots of errors. The difference seems to me to have a lot to do with the basic point of the site. Friendster’s is a ‘who you know’ site, where MySpace is a ‘what you like’ kind of site. It’s just an impression, but Friendster networks are based more on actual real-world relationships, while MySpace networks seem to be based on common interests in music (particularly), sex, and film.
-
Articles
-
Blogular
Cryptography
Food
Forbidden Information
Music
Other
Required Reading
Tech
-
RSS Links
-
Recent Comments
- Matt on iTunes Bloatware Blues
- lemonade truth on iTunes Bloatware Blues
- Mr. Zero on Alfredo Zaragoza
- Maripaz on Alfredo Zaragoza
- Mr. Zero on Alfredo Zaragoza
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Categories
Post a Comment